Skip to main content

All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 52

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Gobinath a/l Sinnaya v Public Prosecutor (and 3 Other Appeals) [2022] 8 AMR 853, CA

Criminal procedure – Bail – Appeal – Appeal against High Court's decision to refuse bail – Whether decision did not finally dispose of parties' rights, not a "decision" under s 3 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 ("CJA"), and not appealable under s 50 of the CJA – Courts of Judicature Act 1964, ss 3, 50 – Penal Code, s 130V, Chapter VIB – Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, s 13

Lee Kheng Lian (sebagai wakil harta pusaka Lee Geok Thye) & Anor v Lee Hai (untuk dirinya dan sebagai wasi harta pusaka Lee Geok Chit) & 6 Ors [2022] 8 AMR 863, CA

Civil procedure – Sale of immovable property by order of court – High Court's order directing sale of lands and distribution of sale proceeds amongst parties according to their registered shares in lands – Appeal against – Whether High Court was empowered to grant relief of sale of lands – Whether High Court bound by decisions of Court of Appeal in construing Order 31 r 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 – Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s 3 – Federal Constitution, Article  13 – Probate and Administration Act 1959, s 60 – Rules of Court 2012, Order 31 r 1

Dong Yang Elevator (M) Sdn Bhd v MXC Elevator Sdn Bhd & 6 Ors [2022] 8 AMR 878, HC

Civil procedure – Contempt of court – Committal proceedings – Wilful non-compliance of Anton Piller order passed by High Court – Whether contemnors guilty of contempt of court – Whether application for discovery of documents negates contemnors' obligation to purge contempt – Whether contemnors' conduct and apology eligible for court to grant lessen punishment – Whether sentence of imprisonment just and appropriate – Rules of Court 2012, Order 52 r 4

Koh Tat Haur & Anor (both carrying on business as a partnership in the name and style of Megatech M&E Engineering) v Brecon Synergy Sdn Bhd (and Another Originating Summons) [2022] 8 AMR 911, HC

Contract – Adjudication decision – Direct payment from principal – Application to strike out originating summons ("OS") filed under s 30 of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 seeking outstanding dues – Whether court could rely on Order 92 r 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 ("ROC"), court's inherent jurisdiction and/or inherent power in striking out application – Whether endorsements on OS and OS ought to be struck out –Whether court can strike out affidavit – Whether court has discretionary power to grant order of costs on solicitor-client basis – Whether issue estoppel principle applicable – Whether evidential burden discharged – Parties liability – Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, ss 4, 15, 30 – Rules of Court 2012, Order 1A, Order 2 r 1(2), Order 6 r 2(1)(f), Order 12 r 12, Order 18 r 19(1)(a), (b), (c), (d), (3)(c), (d), (e), (f), Order 41 r 6, Order 59 rr 16(2)-(5), 21, Order 92 r 4

Sherman bin Salleh & Anor v Public Prosecutor [2022] 8 AMR 941, HC

Criminal law – Corruption – Accepting gratification – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Police officers charged under s 16(a)(B) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 ("MACC Act") read with s 34 of the Penal Code and s 17(a) of the MACC Act – Conviction and sentence challenged – Whether statutory presumption under s 50 of the MACC Act correctly invoked – Whether there was appealable error – Whether charges proffered defective – Whether alleged procedural defects had merit – Whether sentences excessive – Criminal Procedure Code, ss 152, 153, 154, 155, 164, 402B(2)(c) – Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, ss 16(a)(B), 17(a), 50, 52 – Penal Code, s 34

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.