Skip to main content

All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 38

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Majlis Peguam Malaysia v Michael Joseph Carvalho & Anor [2023] 6 AMR 665, FC

Professions – Advocates and solicitors – Compensation – Claim for restitution sum from Advocates and Solicitors Compensation Fund ("Compensation Fund") – Breach of undertaking by advocate and solicitor to release balance of purchase price to clients – Advocate and solicitor at material time, a partner of firm and not sole proprietor – Whether clients entitled to claim restitution sum from Compensation Fund – Whether advocate and solicitor being partner of firm restricted said claim – Whether paragraph 2(b) of the Guidelines on Making a Claim for Compensation arbitrary and contravened s 80(8) and (9) of the Legal Profession Act 1976 ("the LPA") – Whether s 80(8) and (9) of the LPA makes distinction between advocate and solicitor who practise as sole proprietor and those who practise in partnership – Guidelines on Making a Claim for Compensation, paragraph 2(b) – Legal Profession Act 1976, s 80(8), (9), (12)

Suresh a/l Subramaniam v Majlis Perbandaran Selayang [2023] 6 AMR 689, CA

Professions – Advocates and solicitors – Negligence – High Court allowed client's claim against solicitor's negligence in not attending judicial proceedings – Whether solicitor careless in conduct and discharge of its professional duty to client – Whether non-consideration of client's prospect of success in judicial proceedings amounted to fatal misdirection of law – Whether appellate intervention warranted

Tort – Professional negligence – Advocates and solicitors – High Court allowed client's claim against solicitor's negligence in not attending judicial proceedings – Whether solicitor careless in conduct and discharge of its professional duty to client – Whether non-consideration of client's prospect of success in judicial proceedings amounted to fatal misdirection of law – Whether appellate intervention warranted

Edward Stanislaus De Silva & 24 Ors v Yeng Chong Realty Bhd (formerly known as Yeng Chong Realty Sdn Bhd) [2023] 6 AMR 698, HC

Contract – Breach – Sale and purchase agreement ("SPA") – Claim against continuous breach of SPAs – Vacant possession was 36 months from date of SPAs – Non-delivery within stipulated time – Monthly instalments continued to be paid according to SPAs – Class action filed for declaratory and monetary reliefs – Whether damages of 10% of purchase price from expiry of 36 months until basic infrastructure is completed liable to be paid – Whether liability a continuous one – Whether individual titles for bungalow plots could be applied – Whether defence of time-bar could be sustained – Whether SPAs that created contractual relation between parties amount to trustee and beneficial relationship – Whether there was fraudulent breach of trust and unjust enrichment – Limitation Act 1953, s 9(1)

Lim Kuan Chyin v Chu Hoi Ming [2023] 6 AMR 741, HC

Civil procedure – Striking out – Statement of claim – Sessions Court denied striking out of claim for inter alia specific performance and damages – Breach of sale and purchase agreements of shares – Whether agreements valid and binding – Whether second agreement superseded first agreement – Whether clause in second agreement restricted specific performance and other remedies – Whether claim obviously unsustainable – Contracts Act 1950, s 29 – Rules of Court 2012, Order 18 r 19

Contract – Sale and purchase agreement – Breach – Damages – Sessions Court denied striking out of claim for inter alia specific performance and damages – Breach of sale and purchase agreements of shares – Whether agreements valid and binding – Whether second agreement superseded first agreement – Whether clause in second agreement restricted specific performance and other remedies – Whether claim obviously unsustainable – Contracts Act 1950, s 29 – Rules of Court 2012, Order 18 r 19

Wong Kam Hock & Anor (applying on their own behalves and as litigation representative of WHQ and PW, the children) v Regional Registrar Births & Deaths Sabah & 3 Ors [2023] 6 AMR 758, HC

Constitutional law – Citizenship – Citizenship by operation of law – Adoptive parents seek citizenship for children, abandoned at birth under Article 15A of the Federal Constitution ("FC") – Identity of biological mother of children unknown – Birth certificates stated children "non-citizen" – Whether requirement for citizenship by operation of law under Article 14(1)(b) read with section 1(a) and/or section 1(e) of Part II of the Second Schedule to the FC satisfied – Whether presumption under section 19B of Part III of the Second Schedule to the FC arose and/or rebutted – Federal Constitution, Articles 14(1)(b), 15A, Second Schedule, sections 1(a), (e), 2(3) of Part II, section 19B of Part III

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.