Skip to main content

All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 21 (Part 2)

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Remeggious Krishnan v SKS Southern Sdn Bhd (dahulu dikenali sebagai MB Builders Sdn Bhd) [2023] 4 AMR 109, FC

Contract – Breach – Sale and purchase agreement – Split claims for damages for delivery of vacant possession without connection of electricity supply – Appeal against Court of Appeal's decision quashing award of Tribunal for Home Buyers Claims – Whether filing of two separate claims involving different matters in respect of same property contrary to ss 16M and 16Q of the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 – Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966, ss 16M, 16Q

Triple Equity Sdn Bhd & Anor v Golden Success Property Sdn Bhd [2023] 4 AMR 122, CA

Building and common property – Maintenance charges – Appeal – Claim against developer for misrepresentation that units were held under individual titles allowed – Claim against joint management body for lack of legal right to demand maintenance charges allowed – Challenge against High Court's order on ground of non-maintainability of declaratory reliefs sought by owner and its claim being time-barred – Whether declaratory reliefs sought under s 41 of the Specific Relief Act 1950 wrong and abuse of process of court – Whether claim time-barred – Whether joint management body had right to collect maintenance charges – Contracts Act 1950 – Specific Relief Act 1950, s 41 – Strata Management Act 2013, s 25

Qlivia Hen Chye Chin & Anor v Sachaway Sdn Bhd & 4 Ors [2023] 4 AMR 139, HC

Civil procedure – Courts – Jurisdiction – Forum conveniens – Application for transfer of proceedings from Penang High Court to Johor Bahru High Court – Claim for losses due to breach of contract and tortious conduct – Causes of action arose in Johor Bahru – Defendants' place of business and residence in Johor Bahru – Whether Penang High Court or Johor Bahru High Court appropriate forum to have jurisdiction over matter – Whether proceedings ought to be transferred – Whether transfer would be in interest of justice – Rules of Court 2012, Order 57 r 1, 1(1), (4)

Shen Yong Engineering Works Sdn Bhd v Damai Residence Sdn Bhd & Anor [2023] 4 AMR 154, HC

Arbitration – Interim injunctive relief – Mareva injunction – Application for – Claim for outstanding due arising out of construction works on land purchased by first defendant from second defendant – Registered title to land yet to be transferred to first defendant – Works commenced before obtaining relevant approvals – Debt admitted by one of company's directors owning 99% shares in company – Whether company's corporate veil ought to be lifted – Whether company could rely on defence of illegality – Whether claim time-barred – Whether court could grant interim Mareva injunction under s 11(1)(c) of the Arbitration Act 2005 and when – Nature and extent of Mareva injunction – Arbitration Act 2005, s 11(1), (1)(a), (b), (c) – Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 – Contracts Act 1950, s 24, 24(a)-(e) – Limitation Act 1953, ss 6(1)(a), 30(1) – National Land Code, Form 14A – Street, Drainage and Building Act 1974, ss 70, 70A – Town and Country Planning Act 1976, s 23(3)

YAY v WHO (NAN – Co-respondent) [2023] 4 AMR 193, HC

Family law – Ancillary relief – Division of matrimonial assets and maintenance – Parties went through rough marriage for six months wherein judicial separation application was filed by husband – Wife delivered son without husband's knowledge while husband living in adulterous relationship – Husband withdrew judicial separation application and wife filed for divorce – Whether cause of breakdown of marriage was adultery – Whether wife entitled to maintenance and division of matrimonial assets – Whether child entitled to father's surname – Whether wife entitled to custody of child with access to husband – Whether husband entitled to pay child maintenance – Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, ss 53, 54(1)(a), (b), 88(3)

Family law – Children – Custody – Parties went through rough marriage for six months wherein judicial separation application was filed by husband – Wife delivered son without husband's knowledge while husband living in adulterous relationship – Husband withdrew judicial separation application and wife filed for divorce – Whether cause of breakdown of marriage was adultery –  Whether wife entitled to maintenance and division of matrimonial assets – Whether child entitled to father's surname – Whether wife entitled to custody of child with access to husband – Whether husband entitled to pay child maintenance – Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, ss 53, 54(1)(a), (b), 88(3)

Family law – Divorce – Petition – Parties went through rough marriage for six months wherein judicial separation application was filed by husband – Wife delivered son without husband's knowledge while husband living in adulterous relationship – Husband withdrew judicial separation application and wife filed for divorce – Whether cause of breakdown of marriage was adultery – Whether wife entitled to maintenance and division of matrimonial assets – Whether child entitled to father's surname – Whether wife entitled to custody of child with access to husband – Whether husband entitled to pay child maintenance – Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, ss 53, 54(1)(a), (b), 88(3)

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.