Skip to main content

(2025) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 6 (Part 2)

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Ideal City Development Sdn Bhd v Tribunal Pengurusan Strata Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor [2025] 1 AMR 805, CA

Administrative law – Remedies – Judicial review – Parcel owner sought access to documents and information – Whether parcel owner entitled to documents and information sought – Claim allowed by Strata Management Tribunal ("SMT") – Application to quash SMT's award dismissed – Developer compelled to furnish documents and information sought – Whether SMT acted within jurisdiction in granting award – Proper party to make claim against developer – Whether parcel owner – Whether claim ought to fail as joint management body established – Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, s 17A – Strata Management Act 2013, ss 15, 21, 31, 105, 105(1), 107, 117(4), Second Schedule, paragraph 12 of Part 1, Fourth Schedule, paragraph 8 of Part 2 – Strata Management (Strata Management Tribunal) Regulations 2015

HLL Restaurant Sdn Bhd v Zhangji BM Sdn Bhd [2025] 1 AMR 834, HC

Intellectual property – Trademark – Infringement – Claim for unauthorised use of registered Chinese characters mark by competing restaurant business – Whether registration of trademark valid or obtained through fraud – Whether there was infringement of trademark – Whether caused losses – Whether defendant held licence to use trademark in Malaysia – Whether defendant qualified as aggrieved person under the Trademarks Act 2019 – Whether plaintiff entitled to damages – Evidence Act 1950, s 114(g) – Trademarks Act 2019, ss 7(4), 46(1)(a), 48, 52, 54(1), 56

Proventus Bina Sdn Bhd v Jonah Bina Sdn Bhd [2025] 1 AMR 862, HC

Contract – Adjudication and payment disputes – Adjudication decision ("AD") – Applications for setting aside and stay of AD dismissed whilst enforcement application allowed – Subcontractor procured favourable judgment for unpaid works against main contractor – Main contractor filed writ action for recovery of amounts – Whether AD ought to be set aside for breach of natural justice – Whether adjudicator had jurisdiction to adjudicate claim – Whether AD ought to be stayed pending disposal of writ action – Whether AD ought to be enforced – Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, ss 2, 3, 5(2) 15(b), (d), 28 – Rules of Court 2012, Order 69A r 4(2)

TMF Trust Labuan Limited v Robinson Planner Company Limited (and Another Originating Summons) [2025] 1 AMR 895, HC

Arbitration – Award – Applications to set aside and enforce award – Money held under custodian agreement transferred to third parties impersonating authorised personnel – Arbitration proceedings commenced by principal against custodian to recover transferred sums – Partial award granted in favour of principal – Allegation of breach of natural justice against arbitral tribunal – Whether custodian agreement breached by custodian – Whether arbitral tribunal breached natural justice in failing to determine identity of authorised persons – Whether partial award made in conflict of public policy of Malaysia – Whether partial award a nullity – Whether parties' arguments sufficiently considered – Whether arbitral tribunal breached fair hearing rule – Whether threshold for setting aside or enforcement of partial award satisfied – Arbitration Act 2005, ss 37, 37(1)(b)(ii), (2), (2)(b), (b)(i), (ii), 38(2), 39(1)

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.