Skip to main content

(2025) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 6 (Part 1)

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Perspektif Masa Sdn Bhd v Sabah Development Bank Berhad [2025] 1 AMR 705, CA

Civil procedure – Injunctions – Interim injunctions – Appeal against – Injunction application to restrain bank from enforcing loan security documents and commence winding-up petition dismissed – Bank guarantees invoked pursuant to issuance of certificate of practical completion ("CPC") in favour of main contractor appointed by plaintiff – Claim by plaintiff that CPC irregularly issued due to substantial number of incomplete and defective works by main contractor – Whether there was bona fide serious question to be tried that would warrant injunction to be granted – Whether calling of bank guarantee conscionable – Whether appeal ought to be allowed

Alliance Bank Malaysia Berhad v Songmart Malaysia Sdn Bhd & 5 Ors [2025] 1 AMR 725, HC

Civil procedure – Summary judgment – Application for – Suit filed against borrower and guarantors for default in repayment of loan – Grounds of availability of alternate remedy, excessive interest rate and unjust enrichment raised by borrower and guarantors – Whether triable issues raised – Whether applications ought to be allowed – Contracts Act 1950, s 75 – Rules of Court 2012, Order 14

Dongguan Tecenstar Photoelectricity Technology Limited v Crystal Clear Technology Sdn Bhd [2025] 1 AMR 741, HC

Civil procedure – Setting aside – Application for – Judgment in default of appearance ("JID") obtained a day after expiry of time limited for appearing – Whether defendant established defence on merits to support setting aside of JID – Whether principles governing summary judgment relevant to setting aside application – Rules of Court 2012, Order 12 r 4, Order 13 r 8, Order 14, Order 14 r 3(2)

Jitendra Chhotalal Doshi & Anor v Malaysia Rail Link Sdn Bhd & Anor [2025] 1 AMR 750, HC

Civil procedure – Striking out – Statement of claim – Application for – Tenancy agreement executed for rental of part of lands ("leased lands") regarding railway project – Clause waiving landowners' rights to claim for trespass against company included in agreement – Acquisition of leased lands – Landowners claimed agreement vitiated due to misrepresentation and sued company and owner of project for trespass – Whether landowners' claim obviously unsustainable – Whether ought to be struck out – Whether area beyond leased lands used by company – Whether owner of project liable for company's action – Whether landowner ceases to have locus standi to sue trespassers on land once acquired – Whether triable issues raised – Land Acquisition Act 1960, Form K

Low Kim Hong v Low Shee Kian [2025] 1 AMR 761, HC

Civil procedure – Injunctions – Interlocutory injunctions – Dispute over transfer of majority shares in family-owned company – Father allegedly signed documents for transfer shares to eldest son ("disputed documents") under undue influence due to significant health deterioration – Transfer of father's shares to eldest son proceeded despite pending injunction application in different suit – Ex parte interim injunction granted to prevent father's shares and assets from being dealt with pending inter partes hearing – Whether interim injunction ought to be maintained until disposal of action – Whether disputed documents and transfer of shares valid – Whether there were serious issues to be tried warranting further investigation at trial – Whether balance of convenience favoured father – Whether damages constituted adequate remedy

Palikota Sdn Bhd & Anor v Valentino Koh Jiunn Kiat [2025] 1 AMR 780, HC

Civil procedure – Injunctions – Perpetual injunctions – Application to restrain owner of condominium unit from carrying out short term rentals for commercial purposes – Sale and purchase agreement ("SPA") limited use of unit to be residential/dwelling purpose only – Whether unit owner breached his contractual obligations – Whether there was misrepresentation by developer that short-term rentals were allowed – Whether threshold for grant of perpetual injunction met – Whether Order 29 r 1 of the Rules of Court 2012 could only be invoked for interlocutory injunctions and not perpetual injunction – Courts of Judicature Act 1964 – Kota Kinabalu Municipal Council (Hotels and Lodging Houses) By-laws 1966 – Land (Subsidiary Title) Enactment 1972, s 18(5), (5)(a) – Rules of Court 2012, Order 29 r 1 – Specific Relief Act 1950, s 52

Supreme Broadcast International Sdn Bhd v Ketua Pengarah Penyiaran Radio Televisyen Malaysia (RTM) & 2 Ors [2025] 1 AMR 791, HC

Tort – Negligence – Breach of duty – Disputes regarding rights to air certain movie – Whether notice of plaintiff's rights over movie given to first defendant – Whether first defendant owed duty of care to plaintiff and breached it by airing movie despite receiving such notice – Whether caused losses to plaintiff – Whether losses remote – Whether Government of Malaysia vicariously liable – Government Proceedings Act 1956, s 5

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.