Skip to main content

(2024) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 43

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Institut Integriti Malaysia v Roziah binti Harun & Anor [2024] 7 AMR 593, CA

Administrative law – Remedies – Judicial review – High Court quashed Industrial Court's ("IC") award allowing striking out application under s 29(fa) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the Act") – Ground of lack of jurisdiction under s 52 of the Act cited since appellant a government agency – Whether appellant covered within ambit of s 52 of the Act – Whether jurisdictional objection under s 52 of the Act could be entertained under s 29(fa) of the Act – Whether application for judicial review ought to be applied against decision to refer representation to IC – Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss 20(3), 29, 29(fa), (g), 52 – Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act 2007 – Perak Housing and Real Property Board Enactment 2016 – Preservation of Public Security (Sabah) Regulations 2013

Labour law – Industrial Court – Jurisdiction – High Court quashed Industrial Court's ("IC") award allowing striking out application under s 29(fa) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the Act") – Ground of lack of jurisdiction under s 52 of the Act cited since appellant a government agency – Whether appellant covered within ambit of s 52 of the Act – Whether jurisdictional objection under s 52 of the Act could be entertained under s 29(fa) of the Act – Whether application for judicial review ought to be applied against decision to refer representation to IC – Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss 20(3), 29, 29(fa), (g), 52 – Industrial Relations (Amendment) Act 2007 – Perak Housing and Real Property Board Enactment 2016 – Preservation of Public Security (Sabah) Regulations 2013

Sabah Development Bank Berhad v TYL Land & Development Sdn Bhd [2024] 7 AMR 625, CA

Company law – Winding up – Proof of debt – Expungement of – Secured creditor bank filed proof of debts ("PODs") without demarcation of secured or unsecured debt – PODs accepted by liquidator – Bank voted as unsecured creditor at creditors' meeting but subsequently sought to expunge PODs – High Court ("HC") dismissed bank's application – Whether bank could revalue security or withdraw PODs – Whether bank elected to surrender security for debt – Whether HC failed to give effect to s 524(1)(a) and (2) of the Companies Act 2016 – Whether rule 126 of the Companies (Winding-Up) Rules 1972 could be invoked – Whether doctrine of equitable estoppel applicable – Civil Law Act 1956, s 4(1) – Companies Act 2016, s 524(1), (1)(a), (b), (c), (2) – Companies (Winding-Up) Rules 1972, rules 94, 95, 126 – Insolvency Act 1967, s 42, paragraphs 13, 15 of Schedule C – Interpretation Acts 1948 and 1967, s 23(1)

Fadhelah binti Othman (pentadbir estet dan tanggungan Mohd Fadzrin bin Zaidi, si mati) v Mohamad Sukri bin Hat & 10 Ors [2024] 7 AMR 653, HC

Damages (Personal injuries or death) – Death in police custody – Estate claim – Claim for damages by mother of deceased found hung at police lockup – Whether duty of care owed to deceased and to what extent – Whether breached – Whether defendants negligent and derelict in their duties in ensuring deceased's safety and wellbeing whilst in detention – Whether tort of public misfeasance proved – Whether Government of Malaysia vicariously liable – Whether defendants liable to pay damages – Civil Law Act 1956, s 7(3A) – Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, ss 15(1)(a), 39A(1), 39B – Evidence Act 1950, s 114(g) – Federal Constitution, Article 5 – Government Proceedings Act 1956, ss 5, 6 – Lockup Rules 1953, rule 10 – Police Act 1967 – Police Regulations 1952

Tort – Negligence – Duty of care – Claim for damages by mother of deceased found hung at police lockup – Whether duty of care owed to deceased and to what extent – Whether breached – Whether defendants negligent and derelict in their duties in ensuring deceased's safety and wellbeing whilst in detention – Whether tort of public misfeasance proved – Whether Government of Malaysia vicariously liable – Whether defendants liable to pay damages – Civil Law Act 1956, s 7(3A) – Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, ss 15(1)(a), 39A(1), 39B – Evidence Act 1950, s 114(g) – Federal Constitution, Article 5 – Government Proceedings Act 1956, ss 5, 6 – Lockup Rules 1953, rule 10 – Police Act 1967 – Police Regulations 1952

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.