Skip to main content

(2024) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 38

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Setiakon Engineering Sdn Bhd v Mak Yan Tai & Anor [2024] 6 AMR 701, FC

Land law – Indefeasibility – Transfer of title – Fraudulent transfer – Judgment in default ("JID") procured by appellant in suit against original landowner ("deceased") for declaration of land ownership – Deceased's title on land removed and land subsequently registered in appellant's name – Court of Appeal set aside JID and declared sale transactions regarding land void ab initio – Whether deceased's land title defeasible by subsequent purchaser – Whether appellant failed to prove that it was a bona fide purchaser for value – Whether setting aside of JID could nullify subsequent sale transactions – Whether appellant was immediate or subsequent purchaser of land – Whether appellant's land title defeasible and liable to be set aside under s 340(2) of the National Land Code 1965 – Whether land purchased in good faith and for valuable consideration – Whether appellate intervention warranted – National Land Code, ss 5, 89, 340, 340(2), (3), (3)(a), (b) – Rules of Court 2012, Order 47 r 7(1)

Astino Agro-House Multi System Sdn Bhd v Teh Jun Ren & Anor (Chuah Chin Sun & Anor – Third Parties) [2024] 6 AMR 781, HC

Tort – Negligence – Claim for damages – Employees sued for alleged negligence in carrying out duties – Third party action brought against company's executive director and chief executive officer for indemnity – Whether negligence proved against employees – Whether third party action ought to be allowed – Whether suit liable to be dismissed

Chu Chai Yin & Anor v Lim Mee Wan [2024] 6 AMR 801, HC

Land law – Co-proprietorship – Termination – Application for – Property bought pursuant to co-proprietorship agreement in name of first plaintiff and defendant – Defendant ceased to be partner – Plaintiffs sought termination of co-proprietorship agreement as well as sale and transfer of property – Whether plaintiffs satisfied requirements under s 145 of the National Land Code 1965 to terminate co-proprietorship agreement – Whether requirements under Order 31 of the Rules of Court 2012 satisfied – Whether sale and/or transfer of property should be allowed when arbitration proceedings were ongoing in relation to partnership agreement – Whether reliefs sought by plaintiffs appropriate and sustainable – Whether second plaintiff as beneficial owner of property had locus standi to file suit – Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s 25, Schedule, paragraph 3 – National Land Code 1965, s 145, 145(1) – Rules of Court 2012, Order 31

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.