Skip to main content

(2024) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 26

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Ling Boon Huat v Ding Toh Biew [2024] 4 AMR 949, CA

Civil procedure – Judgments and orders – Consent order – Purchaser failed to execute sale and purchase agreement ("SPA") and pay judgment sum pursuant to consent order – Landowner sought revaluation of purchase price due to purchaser's delay – Whether property's purchase price ought to be revalued as at the time when SPA executed – Whether such term could be implied in consent order – Whether amounted to fundamental re-writing of contract – Whether parties bound by consent order

FGV Holdings Berhad (formerly known as "Felda Global Ventures Holdings Berhad") v Mohd Isa bin Abdul Samad & Anor [2024] 4 AMR 971, HC

Company law – Directors – Breach of fiduciary duties – Board of directors approved purchase of residential units for purposes of investment and accommodation for business associates/guests – Cars leased by company to be used in company's carpool system – Directors utilised residential units and leased cars for personal use – Whether directors breached fiduciary duties owed to company – Whether resolution passed for purchase of property valid and binding – Whether directors used units and cars lawfully – Whether company entitled to damages – Whether exemplary damages ought to be imposed – Companies Act 1965, s 132

Nishanthi a/p Jaya v Ketua Pengarah Pendaftaran Negara [2024] 4 AMR 1037, HC

Civil procedure – Declaratory reliefs – Application for – Plaintiff born to Muslim mother sought declaration that she has never professed Islam but Hinduism – Whether plaintiff a Muslim – Whether plaintiff's biological father's religion and marital status relevant in determining her religion at time of her birth – Whether defendants had record about plaintiff's religion – Administration of the Religion of Islam (State of Penang) Enactment 2004, s 2(1)

Islamic law – Declaratory reliefs – Application for – Plaintiff born to Muslim mother sought declaration that she has never professed Islam but Hinduism – Whether plaintiff a Muslim – Whether plaintiff's biological father's religion and marital status relevant in determining her religion at time of her birth – Whether defendants had record about plaintiff's religion – Administration of the Religion of Islam (State of Penang) Enactment 2004, s 2(1)

Public Prosecutor v Muhamad Azmi bin Yusuf & Anor [2024] 4 AMR 1045, HC

Criminal procedure – Bail – Application for – Young accused persons charged for offence of smuggling of migrants – Whether interpretation on right to bail in favour of accused charged under the Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007 ought to be adopted – Factors to be considered by court in granting bail for non-bailable offence – Anti-Trafficking in Persons and Anti-Smuggling of Migrants Act 2007, s 26A – Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s 3 – Criminal Procedure Code, ss 389, 390(1) – Federal Constitution, Article 5(1) – Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, s 13

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.