Skip to main content

(2024) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 25 (Part 1)

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Awesome Broadcasting Sdn Bhd v MYTV Broadcasting Sdn Bhd  [2024] 4 AMR 709, CA

Civil procedure – Injunctions – Interim injunction – Dispute arising out of rates chargeable for digital terrestrial television services ("DTTS") – Rates charged to other content application service providers for DTTS 50% lesser than plaintiff – Discount made possible due to subsidies given by Malaysian Communication and Multimedia Commission ("MCMC") – Notice to suspend DTTS given due to default in payment – Injunctive reliefs sought to restrain such suspension – Whether MCMC relevant and necessary party – Whether alternative statutory remedy available – Whether non-exhaustion of alternative statutory remedy disentitled plaintiff to equitable reliefs – Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, ss 120, 121

Public Prosecutor v Mahiaddin bin Md Yasin [2024] 4 AMR 757, CA

Criminal law – Corruption – Accepting gratification – Appeal against discharge and acquittal against former Prime Minister of Malaysia and President of Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia ("PPBM") concerning gratification accepted for PPBM – High Court struck out all charges on grounds that they did not disclose any offence known to law and lacked in material particulars in breach of s 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code ("CPC") – Whether PPBM is a society and cannot be categorised as "associate" under s 3(c) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 ("Act") – Whether charges failed to state ingredients of offence – Whether omission of particulars of offence in a charge, curable under ss 156 and 422 of the CPC – Criminal Procedure Code, ss 152, 154, 422 – Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009, ss 3(c), 17A(8)(a)-(d), 23(1) – Societies Act 1966, s 7

Kenanga Investors Berhad v Impiana Sdn Bhd & Anor [2024] 4 AMR 778, HC

Contract – Breach – Share sale agreement – Claim for outstanding payment towards purchase of company's shares arising out of option agreement and term sheet – Three agreements and term sheets entered between parties in relation to same transaction – Whether term sheets and agreements were separate and should not be considered as whole – Whether plaintiff entitled to claim for specific performance of the third term sheet and agreement – Whether defendants admitted to amount claimed by plaintiff – Whether second defendant liable for amount claimed by virtue of personal guarantee executed by him

Pan International Electronics (M) Sdn Bhd v Menteri Kewangan Malaysia & Anor [2024] 4 AMR 804, HC

Administrative law – Remedies – Judicial review – Minister rejected appeal for remission of import duty and sales tax imposed by Customs Department upon goods declared to be zero-rated under Customs Duties (Goods of ASEAN Countries Origin) (ASEAN Harmonised Tariff Nomenclature and ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement) Order 2012 ("ATIGA Order") – Conditions of licensed manufacturing warehouse ("LMW licence") allegedly breached – Whether breach of conditions under LMW licence justified imposition of import duty on goods declared to be zero-rated under the ATIGA Order – Whether LMW licence and ATIGA Order had any legal nexus – Whether Customs Department and/or minister exceeded their statutory powers in passing their respective decisions – Whether minister's decisions tainted with illegality and liable to be quashed – Customs Act 1967, ss 11, 11(1), 14A, 65, 65A, 65A(1) – Customs Duties (Goods of ASEAN Countries Origin) (ASEAN Harmonised Tariff Nomenclature and ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement) Order 2012, Second Schedule, paragraph 3(1)

Perbadanan Bekalan Air Pulau Pinang v Peace Centre [2024] 4 AMR 820, HC

Civil procedure – Disposal of case on point of law – Application for – Plaintiff claims restitution of part of compensation received by defendant for government land acquisition – Dispute over amount of land acquired and whether it encompassed plaintiff's portion of land – Plaintiff alleged breach of contract, trust, unjust enrichment and unconscionable conduct against defendant – Whether non-filing of affidavit in support fatal to application under Order 14A of the Rules of Court 2012 – Whether suitable for matter to be disposed of on point of law – Whether full trial warranted – Rules of Court 2012, Order 14A, Order 18 r 19, Order 28 r 8 – Land Acquisition Act 1960 – Water Services Industry Act 2006

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.