Skip to main content

(2024) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Volume 9

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Leong Kian Lee v Kilang Kelapa Sawit Fortuna Sdn Bhd [2024] 9 AMR 162, HC

Company law – Winding up – Petition – Family company – Irretrievable breakdown in mutual trust and confidence between members of company – Whether petition defective for wrong mode of commencement – Petitioner allegedly failed to include alleged "oppressor" in petition – Whether amounts to breach of natural justice – Whether such omission unfair and unjust – Whether a breakdown of mutual trust and confidence between parties exists – Whether just and equitable to wind up company – Companies Act 2016, ss 346, 465(1)(f), (h) – Rules of Court 2012, Order 88 r 2

Muhammad Hafiz bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor [2024] 9 AMR 179, HC

Criminal law – Offences affecting the human body – Sexual assault on child – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Victims were step-daughter and biological daughter of accused – Incidents allegedly took place in 2010 and 2013 – Police report lodged by wife in 2014 – Whether magistrate erred in not considering material inconsistencies in testimonies of prosecution witnesses – Whether there was inordinate delay in filing police report – Whether reasonable explanations provided for delay – Whether testimonies of defence witnesses not properly evaluated – Whether conviction and sentence safe – Penal Code, ss 354, 377E

Criminal law – Offences affecting the human body – Unnatural offences – Inciting child to commit act of gross indecency – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Victims were step-daughter and biological daughter of accused – Incidents allegedly took place in 2010 and 2013 – Police report lodged by wife in 2014 – Whether magistrate erred in not considering material inconsistencies in testimonies of prosecution witnesses – Whether there was inordinate delay in filing police report – Whether reasonable explanations provided for delay – Whether testimonies of defence witnesses not properly evaluated – Whether conviction and sentence safe – Penal Code, ss 354, 377E

Perbadanan Pengurusan Bersama Main Place & 4 Ors v Loke Yeu Ling & 4 Ors [2024] 9 AMR 196, HC

Administrative law – Remedies – Judicial review – Strata Management Tribunal ("tribunal") allowed claim to nullify management corporation's ("MC") resolution for reimbursement of legal fees regarding suit initiated by parcel owners – Legal fees incurred charged to parcel owners' accounts – Whether MC mandated to charge parcel owners – Whether resolution passed valid under s 70 of the Strata Management Act 2013 – Whether resolution reflected intention of community – Whether tribunal's decision vitiated by illegality and procedural impropriety – Strata Management Act 2013, s 70

Sayadi Sdn Bhd v Leef @ Anwar bin Malandi & 24 Ors [2024] 9 AMR 213, HC

Civil procedure – Setting aside – Application for vacant possession – Order for possession obtained in 2018 – Application for leave to issue execution pursuant to Order 45 r 3 and Order 46 r 3 of the Rules of Court 2012 obtained in 2023 – Applicants applied to set aside order for possession outside prescribed time – Whether order for possession duly served on applicants – Whether 10 days' delay in filing setting aside application fatal – Whether order for possession ought to be set aside – Rules of Court 2012, Order 42 r 13, Order 45 r 3, Order 46 r 3, Order 89

Ganesan a/l Ramasamy v Blue Valley Plantation Berhad [2024] 9 AMR 221, HC

Company law – Shares – Transfer – Shares in company purchased from deceased – Transfer never completed – Deceased's wife obtained grant of probate for deceased's assets including shares – Consent order granted for shares to be transferred to purchaser – Refusal by company to effect transfer, citing previous consent orders which allegedly included said shares – Whether consent order enforceable – Whether purchaser had beneficial interest over shares despite incomplete transfer form – Whether transfer form unregistrable – Whether company's submission of no case to answer met legal requirements – Evidence Act 1950, s 114(g)

Note: All Malaysia Report Volume 9 cases are exclusively available online on Westlaw Asia

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.