Skip to main content

(2025) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 25 (Part 2)

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

ASL Bulk Marine Limited v Pemunya dan/atau Pencarter Demis Kapal atau Vesel “Stingray” (IMO No. 9505871) daripada Pelabuhan Liberia (kini dikenali sebagai "BLUERAY" IMO No. 9505871 daripada Pelabuhan Liberia) (Gladys Holdings Inc – Intervener) [2025] 4 AMR 809, HC

Admiralty – Action in rem – Arrest of vessel – Security for claim in arbitration proceedings involving previous owner of vessel – Ownership changed after writ issued but before arrest – Offer for alternative security by new owner refused – Whether new owner entitled to enter appearance as defendant – Whether new owner proper party or intervener in the action – Whether application to intervene after appearing as defendant proper without leave of court or plaintiff's consent – Whether refusal to accept alternative security wrongful and unreasonable – Whether claim for damages sustainable – Rules of Court 2012, Order 21 r 1, Order 70 r 33 – Senior Courts Act 1981 (UK), s 21(4)

Civil procedure – Admiralty proceedings – Declaratory reliefs – Claim for damages – Action in rem filed for arrest of vessel as security for claim in arbitration proceedings involving previous owner of vessel – Ownership changed after writ issued but before arrest – Offer for alternative security by new owner refused – Whether new owner entitled to enter appearance as defendant – Whether new owner proper party or intervener in the action – Whether application to intervene after appearing as defendant proper without leave of court or plaintiff's consent – Whether refusal to accept alternative security wrongful and unreasonable – Whether claim for damages sustainable – Rules of Court 2012, Order 21 r 1, Order 70 r 33 – Senior Courts Act 1981 (UK), s 21(4)

Dato’ Ler Cheng Chye & Anor (Liquidators for Pustaka Efektif Sdn Bhd (in liquidation)) v Aturan Prisma Sdn Bhd & 5 Ors [2025] 4 AMR 822, HC

Arbitration – Arbitration agreement – Stay of proceedings pending reference to arbitration – Subcontractor wound up – Contractor withheld retention sum to set off alleged outstanding dues – Whether withholding of retention sum amounted to void disposition – Whether arbitration agreement remains valid if one party becomes insolvent – Whether dispute arbitrable – Whether arbitration agreement binding on company's directors – Whether stay ought to be granted and against whom – Arbitration Act 2005, s 10, 10(1) – Companies Act 2016, ss 472(1), 540

Khatijah binti Md Ibrahim & Anor v Northern Skyline Sdn Bhd [2025] 4 AMR 868, HC

Civil procedure – Judgments and orders – Impeachment of judgments – Disputes on piece of land for sale – Order for specific performance ("SP order") previously granted by High Court – Allegations of fraud and misrepresentation raised – Whether SP order ought to be set aside – Whether alleged concealment of return of deposit constitutes fraud – Whether concluded contract existed between parties – Whether impeachment suit barred by res judicata in wider sense – Whether judgment obtained by suppression of evidence – Standard of proof

Nadarajah Lingam a/l Sinnadurai & 4 Ors v Dato’ Sri Dr Suresh Raj Lachmanan & 6 Ors [2025] 4 AMR 889, HC

Civil procedure – Action – Reinstatement of – Suit struck out for non-compliance with directions contained in unless order – Whether plaintiffs should have applied to set aside striking out order instead of reinstating suit – Whether cogent explanation provided for non-compliance of unless order – Rules of Court 2012, Order 34 r 2(4), Order 92 r 4

Pendakwa Raya v Darvin Raj a/l Gunaselan (and Another Appeal) [2025] 4 AMR 897, HC

Criminal procedure – Charge – Misjoinder of charges – Cross-appeals – Charges under ss 41(1) and 44(1) of Road Transport Act 1987 ("Act") – Prosecution sought withdrawal of charge under s 44(1) of the Act and grant of discharge not amounting to acquittal against accused after trial – Accused granted discharge amounting to acquittal for charge under s 44(1) of the Act but convicted under s 41(1) of the same – Whether trial vitiated by misjoinder of charges – Whether retrial should be ordered – Criminal Procedure Code, ss 165, 166, 422 – Road Transport Act 1987, ss 41, 41(1), 42, 43, 44(1), (4), 45F, 45G

Road traffic – Driving and offences connected therewith – Causing death by reckless or dangerous driving – Cross-appeals – Charges under ss 41(1) and 44(1) of Road Transport Act 1987 ("Act") – Prosecution sought withdrawal of charge under s 44(1) of the Act and grant of discharge not amounting to acquittal against accused after trial – Accused granted discharge amounting to acquittal for charge under s 44(1) of the Act but convicted under s 41(1) of the same – Whether trial vitiated by misjoinder of charges – Whether retrial should be ordered – Criminal Procedure Code, ss 165, 166, 422 – Road Transport Act 1987, ss 41, 41(1), 42, 43, 44(1), (4), 45F, 45G

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.