Skip to main content

(2025) All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 23 (Part 1)

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

BU Development Sdn Bhd v Adeline Tan Kean Sim & Anor [2025] 4 AMR 353, CA

Contract – Breach – Sale and purchase agreement – Claim for liquidated ascertained damages – Booking fee paid prior to execution of sale and purchase agreement – Whether delivery of vacant possession computed from date of sale and purchase agreement or date of booking fee payment – Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966

Housing development – Sale and purchase agreement – Breach of – Claim for liquidated ascertained damages – Booking fee paid prior to execution of sale and purchase agreement – Whether delivery of vacant possession computed from date of sale and purchase agreement or date of booking fee payment – Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966

Khairuddin bin Abu Hassan v Wan Aedil bin Wan Abdullah & 7 Ors (and Another Appeal) [2025] 4 AMR 366, CA

Tort – Malicious prosecution – Damages – Cross-appeals – Plaintiff requesting police investigation into 1MDB affairs arrested twice under Penal Code and Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 – Discharge and acquittal by Sessions Court – Whether malicious prosecution proved – Whether there was basis for plaintiff's arrest and detention – Whether plaintiff entitled to exemplary and aggravated damages – Whether claim for legal fees was special damages and strictly proved – Whether appeals ought to be allowed – Criminal Procedure Code, s 23(1) – Penal Code, ss 124C, 124K, 124L – Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, s 4(1)

Tort – Unlawful detention – Damages – Cross-appeals – Plaintiff requesting police investigation into 1MDB affairs arrested twice under Penal Code and Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 – Discharge and acquittal by Sessions Court – Whether unlawful detention proved – Whether there was basis for plaintiff's arrest and detention – Whether plaintiff entitled to exemplary and aggravated damages – Whether claim for legal fees was special damages and strictly proved – Whether appeals ought to be allowed – Criminal Procedure Code, s 23(1) – Penal Code, ss 124C, 124K, 124L – Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, s 4(1)

Loganathan a/l Thiagarajan v Dr Lee Mun Toong [2025] 4 AMR 397, HC

Tort – Negligence – Medical negligence – Liability and quantum – Patient struck with hard object in left eye and suffered bleeding – Doctor administered normal course of treatment for injury sustained – Patient subsequently diagnosed with penetrating left eye injury with intraocular foreign body ("IOFB") and endophthalmitis, resulting in surgery and loss of perfect vision – Whether doctor breached duty of care for failing to detect IOFB in patient's eye – Whether medical negligence established – Damages and quantum – Whether patient's claim ought to be allowed

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.